I feel like a good portion outside of this statement is already implied... can you clarify this? I have a feeling this is going to need an existential-ontological clarification. How could a negation of action (if such a thing exists) be the termination of a Dasein? And just how could one Dasein assert the termination of an entity within-the-world of Being? But if action is physical, it must be interpreted as meaning towards-Dasein. But again a termination of action (assuming ~)would be only an end to the totality of Being-with-meaning, but a Dasein's throwness within-the-world makes an impossibility of nothingness.
but an action is meaning in the sense of dasein and the world-within, two things much be implied here: 1. dasein's action is being-towards some end of itself. 2. it's action are always being-towards other daseins.. The action comports an Being away from itself and towards the Others. But to say the negation of action leads to the ending of (dasein) <-implied announcement on your part) is fallacious unless you conduct an existential-ontological assertion of dasein's beingness.
I feel like a good portion outside of this statement is already implied... can you clarify this? I have a feeling this is going to need an existential-ontological clarification.
ReplyDeleteHow could a negation of action (if such a thing exists) be the termination of a Dasein? And just how could one Dasein assert the termination of an entity within-the-world of Being? But if action is physical, it must be interpreted as meaning towards-Dasein.
But again a termination of action (assuming ~)would be only an end to the totality of Being-with-meaning, but a Dasein's throwness within-the-world makes an impossibility of nothingness.
but an action is meaning in the sense of dasein and the world-within, two things much be implied here: 1. dasein's action is being-towards some end of itself. 2. it's action are always being-towards other daseins.. The action comports an Being away from itself and towards the Others. But to say the negation of action leads to the ending of (dasein) <-implied announcement on your part) is fallacious unless you conduct an existential-ontological assertion of dasein's beingness.
Fuck You ;)
ReplyDelete